Aerial Asset Protection: Leveraging Drone Documentation for Insurance Readiness, Compliance, and Tax Optimization in Ohio

I. Executive Summary: The Strategic Mandate for Homeowner Aerial Documentation

The current operating environment for Ohio residential property owners is characterized by increasing frequency of weather-related claims and heightened scrutiny from insurance carriers utilizing advanced surveillance technologies. This dynamic necessitates a profound shift from passive risk acceptance to proactive risk management utilizing Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), commonly referred to as drones. Comprehensive aerial documentation has become an essential financial shield, moving far beyond simple structural inspection to serve critical functions in regulatory compliance and financial optimization.

The analysis confirms a quadruple value proposition delivered by professional drone documentation. First, it is indispensable for mitigating high-frequency insurance claims, particularly those related to wind, hail, and water intrusion. Second, it serves as the necessary defensive record to prevent disputes, nonrenewal, or outright cancellation resulting from aggressive insurer aerial surveillance practices. Third, the resulting quantitative data substantiates local property tax relief applications, such as the DTE 26 form in Stark County, following significant storm damage. Finally, professional inspection data provides the objective evidentiary support required by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to correctly classify maintenance costs as either deductible repairs or capitalized improvements.

The financial imperative for adopting this technology is supported by industry data showing that drones offer significant efficiencies. Drone-based damage assessments result in cost reductions ranging from 20 to 35% compared to outdated manual methods.¹ Furthermore, they improve processing times by 60%, drastically accelerating the cycle time for claims and maintenance planning.¹ The insurance sector itself recognizes the utility, estimating annual savings of $7 billion realized through the application of UAS technology in both pre-loss and post-loss scenarios.² This utilization by the underwriting industry underscores the competitive and technical advantage homeowners gain by employing the same sophisticated tools.

A paramount strategic mandate for the modern homeowner is the establishment of comprehensive baseline documentation. The rise of unannounced insurer aerial surveillance, which can lead to adverse underwriting decisions based on perceived risk factors like deteriorating roofs or overhanging branches, renders a pre-existing, homeowner-controlled visual record essential.³ This documentation must be time-stamped and geotagged to hold evidentiary weight. Historically, the insurance industry focused on drone use for post-loss claims processing.⁵ However, the increasing incidence of insurers leveraging aerial data for pre-loss nonrenewal actions highlights a newly adversarial dynamic.³ This dictates that homeowners must utilize the same objective technology to defend against aggressive underwriting algorithms, effectively treating the insurance relationship not as a guaranteed contract, but as a compliance challenge demanding continuous data maintenance.

II. The Ohio Homeowner Risk Profile and the Power of Objective Data in Claims

Ohio’s climatic and geographical position exposes residential properties to a specific set of atmospheric hazards that dominate homeowner insurance claims. Understanding this risk profile dictates where documentation efforts should be concentrated, primarily focusing on the property’s exterior envelope—especially the roofing system.

Analysis of Catastrophic (CAT) Event Risk in Ohio

Data consistently reveals the dominance of atmospheric hazards as the leading cause of residential property loss. For example, in 2023, Wind and Hail accounted for approximately 42.5% of property claims frequency across the U.S., a figure that aligns closely with Ohio’s historical vulnerability (45.4% in 2022).⁷ This high frequency confirms that documenting the integrity of the roof and exterior structure is the primary defensive priority for asset protection. The average severity of these claims, while not the highest, remains substantial at approximately $14,747.⁷

Furthermore, water intrusion presents a major financial concern. Water Damage and Freezing consistently rank as the second most frequent cause of loss (22.6% in 2023).⁷ Crucially, while not the most frequent, these water-related claims carry a high average severity, estimated at $15,400.⁷ This severity is often compounded by hidden damage that may go undetected during manual inspections. While less frequent, catastrophic losses due to Fire and Lightning carry the highest average severity, reaching approximately $88,170 per claim.⁷ In the event of a total or near-total loss from fire, comprehensive aerial baseline documentation proves vital for establishing the pre-loss valuation necessary for full and expedited reconstruction.

Cause of Loss	% of Property Claims (Frequency, 2023 Approx.)	Average Claim Severity (Approx.)	Mitigation via Drone Documentation
Wind and Hail	$\sim$42.5% 7	$14,747 [7]$	Baseline documentation of roof wear; precise quantification of damage extent post-loss using high-resolution orthomosaics.5
Water Damage and Freezing	$\sim$22.6% 7	$15,400 [7]$	Identification of hidden leaks and structural moisture intrusion through thermal imaging and moisture mapping.5
Fire and Lightning	$\sim$21.6% 7	$88,170 [7]$	Comprehensive pre-loss baseline for total property valuation and reconstruction evidence.

Drone Evidence as Indisputable Fact: Shifting the Burden of Proof

The utility of drone documentation is based on its ability to produce objective, comprehensive data that radically reduces subjective interpretation conflicts between the carrier and the policyholder.⁵ This capability is critical to accelerating claim settlement agreements.

A central advantage of UAS technology is the deployment of thermal imaging. This capability allows for the detection of hidden water intrusion, insulation deficiencies, and structural damage that is often invisible to the naked eye.⁵ By providing scientific measurement rather than opinion-based assessment, thermal data prevents disputes that typically arise weeks or months after the initial assessment when hidden issues manifest.⁵

Furthermore, in formal arbitration proceedings, drone-captured evidence constitutes “contemporaneous documentation,” meaning it captures conditions at the moment of loss or immediately thereafter, before any alterations or repairs commence.⁵ This objective evidence fundamentally shifts the burden of proof. Industry analysis confirms the strategic value: claims supported by comprehensive drone documentation are 85% more likely to settle before arbitration is necessary, and when arbitration does occur, drone-documented claims prevail in 90% of cases.⁵

For properties featuring complex structures or large roof systems, the adoption of professional UAS technology, which utilizes 3D modeling, provides indisputable dimensional data. While data regarding commercial properties indicates that 3D model documentation reduces measurement-related disputes by 90% and accelerates settlement by 40% ⁵, this methodology should be universally applied to residential properties. Residential claims often involve complex roof geometry, where manual measurements frequently lead to conflicts over required materials and labor estimates. By adopting commercial best practices, which provide indisputable dimensional data for roof surfaces, homeowners gain the leverage necessary to ensure the claim payout is based on precise, verifiable metrics rather than subjective, lower estimates typically offered by carriers.

III. Insurance Defense: Establishing Your Property Baseline Against Nonrenewal

A substantial and increasing risk faced by Ohio homeowners is the use of aerial surveillance by insurance carriers to assess risk during the policy term, often leading to nonrenewal or sudden demands for expensive repairs. This necessitates a proactive defensive documentation strategy.

The Proactive Threat: Insurer Surveillance and Policy Cancellation

A trend that began in the southern United States has rapidly spread to Northeast Ohio, where insurers are actively using high-resolution aerial imagery, captured via drones or satellites, to evaluate property conditions.³ This surveillance is often conducted without the knowledge or explicit consent of the homeowner.⁸ Homeowners, including long-time policyholders, are consequently receiving unexpected cancellation or nonrenewal notices based on perceived structural issues, such as a “dwelling roof in poor condition” or the presence of common environmental hazards, like overhanging tree branches.⁴

A homeowner in Massachusetts, for example, received a cancellation threat after a drone identified overhanging tree branches, demanding their removal within six weeks or loss of coverage.⁴ This highlights the invasive nature of the practice and the short deadlines imposed, forcing policyholders into expensive, urgent mitigation.⁴ Consumer advocacy groups confirm that this type of unauthorized surveillance is becoming “very, very common”.⁸ Furthermore, this surveillance is often automated. The captured photos are analyzed by Artificial Intelligence (AI) and computer systems programmed to identify and flag risk factors such as mold, damaged roof tiles, or trees touching the dwelling.⁴

This creates a scenario where the homeowner is defending their policy not against a human adjuster’s subjective opinion, but against a programmatic output from a carrier’s automated risk assessment system. Therefore, the homeowner’s documentation must be equally objective, rigorous, and machine-readable (geotagged, high-resolution, date-stamped imagery) to directly contradict the AI’s risk classification and prevent policy loss.⁹

Mitigation Strategy: Generating and Submitting Baseline Pre-Loss Imagery

The most effective defensive measure is for the homeowner to proactively commission regular UAS inspections by FAA-licensed pilots.¹⁰ This action captures high-resolution, geotagged, and time-stamped imagery that establishes a legally defensible baseline of the property’s condition on a specified date.⁹

If a nonrenewal notice is received based on poor condition, the immediate, documented execution of required repairs is paramount. For instance, if a notice cites “dwelling roof in poor condition” ⁶, the homeowner should repair or replace the roof and then provide the insurer with drone-captured “before” documentation (showing the issue) and conclusive “after” documentation (showing full compliance).¹¹ Proving timely risk reduction efforts—such as roof repair, tree limb removal, or other structural improvements—via verifiable visual proof is essential to overturn the adverse underwriting decision.¹¹ Policyholders are advised to communicate proactively with their insurer approximately 60 days before the policy is due for renewal to inquire about their policy standing and submit any risk-reducing documentation to improve their risk profile.¹¹

Dispute Resolution Pathways in Ohio

Should a homeowner receive a nonrenewal or cancellation notice they believe is unjust, specific administrative and legal pathways exist in Ohio for recourse.

1. Internal Dispute and Appeal: The initial step involves contacting the insurance provider directly, ideally the consumer affairs division, and requesting the nonrenewal reason in writing.¹¹ The policyholder must then follow up in writing, detailing their appeal and providing the comprehensive aerial documentation showing corrected issues or disputing the alleged damage.¹¹
2. Ohio Department of Insurance (ODI) Complaint: If the internal dispute fails, Ohio residents can file a formal complaint with the Ohio Department of Insurance (ODI).³ The ODI regulates insurance practices and reviews complaints related to cancellations, refunds, and claim disputes.¹⁴ The ODI investigates whether the company, agent, or adjuster broke state insurance laws or administrative rules.¹⁴ Ohio law governing general drone privacy (HB 77) is evolving and slated to become effective in April 2025.¹⁶ Until specific regulations prohibit unauthorized insurer surveillance, the ODI remains the primary regulatory safeguard for policyholders.¹⁸

IV. Capitalizing on Crisis: Property Tax Relief in Stark County

Following severe storm damage, property owners in Stark County, Ohio, may qualify for significant real estate tax relief by obtaining a deduction in the property’s valuation. Drone documentation serves to rapidly quantify the damage and support the required state application.

Ohio Law and Eligibility for Valuation Deduction (DTE 26)

Ohio state law provides a statutory mechanism allowing property owners to apply for a deduction from the assessed value of their home if it was damaged or destroyed by fire, flood, storm, or intentional demolition.¹⁹ This relief is accessed by filing the Application for Valuation Deduction for Destroyed or Damaged Real Property, Form DTE 26.¹⁹

It is critical to note the strict statutory limitations regarding what can be deducted. The relief applies only to the real property structure. Damage to ancillary items often affected by storms—including trees, landscaping, fencing, and personal property—is specifically excluded from the residential deduction calculation.²² The amount of the deduction allowed is determined by the calendar quarter in which the damage occurred, ranging from a 100% reduction if damaged in the first quarter, down to 25% if damaged in the last three months of the year.¹⁹

Procedural Compliance: Deadlines and Filing with the County Auditor

The DTE 26 application must be filed with the Stark County Auditor.¹⁹ Compliance with filing deadlines is non-negotiable for eligibility:

Damage Occurrence Period	Filing Deadline	Tax Impact Timeline
January 1 – September 30	December 31 20	The reduction is applied to the property valuation for the current tax year, affecting tax bills due and payable in the following year.19
October 1 – December 31	January 31 of the following year 20	The reduction is applied to the property valuation for the current tax year, affecting tax bills due and payable in the following year.19

After the DTE 26 application is successfully filed, the County Fiscal Office Appraisal Department conducts the necessary inspections to officially determine the extent and dollar amount of the damage.²² If the property owner disagrees with the final valuation resulting from the DTE 26 process or misses the informal appeal window, they retain the right to file a formal complaint with the Stark County Board of Revision by the subsequent March 31 deadline.²⁴

Drone Documentation as Quantitative Support for DTE 26

The DTE 26 application requires the homeowner to provide key quantitative and descriptive data, specifically a “Description of damage” and the “Estimated dollar amount of damage”.²³

This is where the financial documentation generated for the insurance claim integrates seamlessly with the tax relief application. The precise, verifiable data captured by professional UAS inspections—including high-resolution orthomosaics and 3D modeling—provides objective proof of the damage extent and accurately quantifies the affected area. This information allows for the generation of rigorous, defensible repair estimates, directly substantiating the estimated dollar amount required on the DTE 26 form. By utilizing professional drone reports, homeowners streamline the required inspection process by the County Auditor, providing unambiguous evidence that solidifies the estimated loss and validates the claim for deduction.

The documentation prepared to meet the stringent arbitration standards of the insurance industry ⁵ simultaneously satisfies the local government’s need for quantitative damage assessment.²³ A single, professional post-damage drone assessment thus maximizes the return on documentation investment by serving as foundational evidence for both the insurance recovery process and the local property tax relief mechanism.

V. Federal Tax Strategy: Classifying Costs for Homeowners and Landlords

For property owners who utilize their residences as rentals, or for long-term homeowners planning future sales, the correct federal tax classification of expenditures is crucial. Drone inspection data is uniquely suited to provide the objective evidence required by the IRS to differentiate between deductible repairs and capitalized improvements.

Deductible Repairs vs. Capital Improvements: The IRS Regulatory Framework

IRS regulations, guided by Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 162 (deductible ordinary expenses) and Section 263(a) (capitalized costs), require taxpayers to correctly categorize expenditures related to tangible property.²⁵ This distinction is critical but is, as recognized by the Supreme Court, of a “highly factual nature” and constitutes a distinction of “degree and not of kind”.²⁶

The core analytical framework distinguishes between actions intended to keep the property functional versus those intended to put it in a new or materially better condition:

• Repair (Deductible): Costs incurred to maintain the property in an ordinarily efficient operating condition over its useful life. This is characterized as keeping the property in efficient operating condition.²⁶ Examples include fixing a localized leak, painting walls, or replacing broken hardware.²⁷ These expenses are immediately deductible for rental property owners.
• Improvement (Capitalized): Expenditures that appreciably prolong the life of the property, materially increase its value, or adapt it to a new use.²⁶ This is characterized as putting the property in better condition. Examples include a major kitchen refurbishment, replacement of an entire HVAC system, or adding a structure like a conservatory.²⁷

Tax Impact Differentiation

The categorization of an expense dictates its tax treatment:

• Rental Property Owners (Landlords): Deductible repairs can be claimed immediately against rental income in the current tax year.²⁸ Capital improvements must be added to the property’s cost basis and then recovered through depreciation over the asset’s statutory useful life (typically 27.5 years for residential rentals).²⁸
• Homeowners (Primary Residence): Repairs are generally non-deductible.²⁷ Capital improvements are added to the home’s cost basis. This adjusted basis is later subtracted from the final sales price to determine the taxable capital gain when the property is sold.²⁷

Audit Readiness: Using Drone Inspections to Substantiate Classification

Due to the factual nature of the repair-versus-improvement determination, detailed and objective documentation is essential for audit readiness. Drone inspections provide superior evidentiary support:

• Substantiating Repairs: Drone imagery captured before the work, particularly thermal imaging, can confirm a localized fault (e.g., a single leaky roof section or faulty gutter).⁵ Documentation showing that the work merely restored the specific area to its previous, functional state objectively justifies classification as a deductible repair (“Keep in”).²⁶
• Substantiating Improvements: Conversely, a UAS assessment demonstrating the widespread degradation or obsolescence of a property system (e.g., thermal scans confirming failure across an entire roof membrane) confirms that a subsequent full replacement materially prolonged the asset’s useful life. The high-resolution 3D models and photographic records document the scope and extent of a full system upgrade, supporting the mandate that the expenditure be capitalized (“Put in”).³⁰

Expense Type	Tax Treatment (Landlord)	IRS Purpose Test (IRC § 263(a) vs § 162)	Supportive Drone Evidence
Repair	Currently Deductible 28	Keeping property in ordinarily efficient operating condition (“Keep in”).26	Thermal imagery confirming localized fault restoration; documentation of patching or minor replacements that do not extend the life of the entire system.5
Capital Improvement	Added to Cost Basis / Depreciated 28	Prolonging life, materially increasing value, or adapting to new uses (“Put in”).26	3D modeling and high-resolution photo confirmation of full system replacement (e.g., new roof, major structural addition), proving material increase in value or prolonged life.30

Crucially, because capital improvements must be tracked as part of the cost basis for years or decades, particularly for rental properties subject to depreciation recapture, the quality and permanence of the documentation are paramount.²⁸ Digital, geotagged drone documentation provides a superior, enduring record compared to traditional paper invoices or subjective photographs, significantly reducing future compliance risk during audits or property disposition.

VI. Conclusion and Actionable Implementation Roadmap

Professional UAS documentation is not merely a tool for damage assessment; it is a fundamental pillar of modern financial defense and regulatory compliance for the Ohio homeowner and investor. It provides the necessary objective evidence to navigate an increasingly hostile insurance landscape, secure mandated local tax relief following a catastrophe, and meet the stringent documentation requirements of the IRS.

Synthesis of Defensive Strategy

The analysis demonstrates that comprehensive drone documentation serves as the essential financial shield:

1. Insurance Claim Defense: High-fidelity evidence (thermal imaging, 3D modeling) is proven to expedite settlements and significantly improve success rates in arbitration (85% more likely to settle early, 90% prevalence if arbitrated).⁵
2. Underwriting Defense: Establishing a pre-loss baseline is the primary defense against policy nonrenewal driven by unauthorized insurer aerial surveillance and automated risk assessment systems.⁴
3. Tax Maximization: The quantitative data generated for post-loss insurance claims integrates directly into the requirements for the Ohio DTE 26 property tax valuation deduction, maximizing financial recovery from a single event.²³
4. Audit Compliance: Detailed, comparative documentation (before and after) is necessary to substantiate the factual difference between deductible repairs and capitalized improvements, safeguarding federal tax filings.²⁶

Actionable Implementation Checklist for Homeowners/Investors

To effectively integrate this strategy, residential asset owners should adhere to the following implementation roadmap:

1. Pilot and Service Selection: Retain the services of FAA Part 107 licensed drone operators experienced in residential and commercial property assessment. Professional operators must carry adequate liability insurance (often $$$1 million minimum is recommended) and adhere to all federal (Part 107) and evolving state airspace regulations.²
2. Establish Baseline Inspection Schedule: Conduct a comprehensive, pre-loss baseline inspection immediately upon acquiring a property or adopting this strategy. Schedule recurring inspections every 1-3 years, or immediately following any significant weather event (severe thunderstorm, hail, high winds) to maintain an up-to-date record of condition.⁹
3. Data Management Protocols: Ensure all resulting imagery, orthomosaics, and 3D models are geotagged, time-stamped, and stored securely in a digital format. This secure, verifiable digital record is essential for rapid submission during insurance disputes or for long-term retention required for IRS basis tracking.⁹
4. Documentation Mandate for Maintenance: Require the professional drone operator to perform and document both the “before” and “after” conditions for all significant maintenance projects. This practice legally substantiates whether the expenditure constitutes a repair or an improvement for federal tax reporting purposes.²⁶
5. Regulatory Consultation: Always consult with a qualified tax professional and insurance agent to ensure that the drone-documented evidence is utilized correctly in accordance with specific state tax law (DTE 26), local assessment procedures (Stark County Auditor), and complex federal tax regulations (IRC § 162 and § 263(a)).²³

Works cited

1. Drone vs. Manual Inspections: Accuracy and Cost for Adjusters – Struction Solutions, accessed October 27, 2025, https://structionsolutions.com/blog/drone-vs-manual-inspections-cost-for-adjusters/
2. Drones for Insurance Claims – Connor Environmental Services, accessed October 27, 2025, https://connorsolutions.com/drones-for-insurance/
3. Drone Roof Inspections Are Canceling Home Insurance in Ohio—Here’s How to Protect Yourself – ohiobrokerdirect.com, accessed October 27, 2025, https://ohiobrokerdirect.com/ohio-homeowners-are-facing-a-new-insurance-risk-and-its-flying-overhead-drone-roof-inspections-are-canceling-home-insurance-in-ohio/
4. Insurance companies using drones to inspect homes without alerting owners. Here’s what you should know. – CBS News, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.cbsnews.com/boston/news/iteam-insurance-company-homes-massachustts-topsfield/
5. How drones help resolve disputes with project stakeholders – Struction Solutions, accessed October 27, 2025, https://structionsolutions.com/blog/how-drones-help-resolve-disputes-with-project-stakeholders/
6. Insurance Companies Are Using Satellites to Drop Policies – Pristine Clean, accessed October 27, 2025, https://pristineclean.com/insurance-companies-are-using-satellites-to-drop-policies/
7. Facts + Statistics: Homeowners and renters insurance | III, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.iii.org/fact-statistic/facts-statistics-homeowners-and-renters-insurance
8. US insurers using drones to inspect homes without owners knowing — even canceling polices. What can you do? – United Policyholders, accessed October 27, 2025, https://uphelp.org/us-insurers-using-drones-to-inspect-homes-without-owners-knowing-even-canceling-polices-what-can-you-do/
9. Drone Advancements in Claims Investigations – Ethos Risk Services, accessed October 27, 2025, https://ethosrisk.com/blog/drone-advancements-in-claims-investigations/
10. Legal Implications of Using Drones in Real Estate Inspections and Marketing – Newport Attorney – Sayer Regan & Thayer, LLP, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.srtflaw.com/legal-implications-of-using-drones-in-real-estate-inspections-and-marketing/
11. Dropped by Your Home Insurer? Information for Texas Residents – United Policyholders, accessed October 27, 2025, https://uphelp.org/buying-tips/dropped-by-your-home-insurer-information-for-texas-residents/
12. How to Avoid a Homeowners Insurance Nonrenewal After Filing a Claim, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.homeinsurehelp.com/how-to-avoid-a-homeowners-insurance-nonrenewal-after-filing-a-claim
13. How to Get Homeowners Insurance After Nonrenewal | Bankrate, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.bankrate.com/insurance/homeowners-insurance/get-home-insurance-after-non-renewal/
14. How to File an Insurance Complaint – Ohio Department of Insurance – Ohio.gov, accessed October 27, 2025, https://insurance.ohio.gov/wps/wcm/connect/gov/8864b203-0489-427e-bb0f-478474e2af3b/how_to_file_complaint_2024.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE.Z18_K9I401S01H7F40QBNJU3SO1F56-8864b203-0489-427e-bb0f-478474e2af3b-p9ZhuJz
15. Information for Consumers – Ohio Department of Insurance, accessed October 27, 2025, https://insurance.ohio.gov/consumers
16. drone | Farm Office – The Ohio State University, accessed October 27, 2025, https://farmoffice.osu.edu/blog-tags/drone
17. Ohio Drone Owners, time to prepare., accessed October 27, 2025, https://dspalliance.org/ohio-drone-owners-time-to-prepare/
18. Drones in Flight While Consumer Concerns Rise – Ohio Insurance Agents, accessed October 27, 2025, https://ohioinsuranceagents.com/blog/2024/drones-in-flight-while-consumer-concerns-rise/
19. News Release 070704 – Ohio Department of Taxation – Ohio.gov, accessed October 27, 2025, https://tax.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/tax/help-center/communications/news-releases/news-release-070704
20. Forms – Tax Programs – DTE 26 – Summit County Fiscal Office, accessed October 27, 2025, https://fiscaloffice.summitoh.net/index.php/documents-a-forms/viewdownload/4-tax-programs/97-dte-26
21. Damaged Property – Summit County Fiscal Office, accessed October 27, 2025, https://fiscaloffice.summitoh.net/index.php/damaged-property
22. REAL ESTATE TAX RELIEF AVAILABLE TO VICTIMS OF THE RECENT STORM, accessed October 27, 2025, https://fiscaloffice.summitoh.net/index.php/news/412-real-estate-tax-relief-available-to-victims-of-the-recent-storm
23. Application for Valuation Deduction for Destroyed or Damaged Real Property, accessed October 27, 2025, https://tax.ohio.gov/static/forms/real_property/dte-dte26-fi.pdf
24. Stark County 2024 Reappraisal, accessed October 27, 2025, https://publicreview-starkcountyohio.hub.arcgis.com/
25. Tangible property final regulations | Internal Revenue Service, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/tangible-property-final-regulations
26. Capitalization of Tangible Property Audit Technique Guide – IRS, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p5712.pdf
27. Home Improvements and Your Taxes – TurboTax Tax Tips & Videos – Intuit, accessed October 27, 2025, https://turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tips/home-ownership/home-improvements-and-your-taxes/L6IwHGrx6
28. Capital Improvements vs. Repairs and Maintenance: Rental Accounting 101, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.landlordstudio.com/blog/capital-improvements-vs-repairs
29. 2022 Publication 527 – IRS, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/p527–2022.pdf
30. Drones for Appraisal Use – Working RE Magazine, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.workingre.com/drones-for-appraisal-use/
31. Home Inspection Drones for Safer Assessments, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.zenadrone.com/home-inspection-drone/
32. Rule 3339-16-17 | Unmanned aircraft system (drones and model aircraft). – Ohio Laws, accessed October 27, 2025, https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-administrative-code/rule-3339-16-17