Aerial Inspections, LLC

Unmanned Systems in Public Infrastructure: A Strategic Analysis of Accelerated Inspection and Disaster Recovery

I. Executive Summary: UAS as a Strategic Imperative for Infrastructure Resilience

The adoption of Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS), commonly known as drones, represents a fundamental paradigm shift in public infrastructure management. This technology addresses the chronic triple mandate faced by transportation agencies and emergency responders: enhancing worker safety, maximizing operational efficiency, and securing comprehensive, accurate data for long-term asset management. Agencies such as the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) have successfully transitioned UAS from pilot project status to standardized, mission-critical operations, establishing a national model for infrastructure resilience and proactive maintenance.

The measurable return on investment (ROI) derived from these programs is substantial and well-documented. Industry benchmarks and state-level data consistently demonstrate significant operational velocity gains, with UAS-assisted inspections reducing field time by up to 75%.1 Concurrently, cost efficiencies are robust, with case studies confirming reductions in inspection expenses ranging from 40% to 60% compared to legacy manual methods or reliance on specialized equipment such as snooper trucks.3

Beyond efficiency, UAS technology provides crucial public safety and risk management benefits by eliminating the need for personnel to engage in hazardous inspection activities, particularly in high-traffic or post-disaster environments.5

Strategically, the highest value of UAS lies in the convergence of the high-fidelity data captured with Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) and Artificial Intelligence (AI). This integration facilitates the creation of comprehensive, geo-referenced data models and Digital Twins, which fundamentally transform Enterprise Asset Management (EAM). By enabling automated change detection and predictive maintenance scheduling, UAS data drives smarter decisions regarding compliance, repair prioritization, and long-term capital planning.7

II. Chapter 1: The Mandate for Modernization: From Structural Deficiency to Autonomous Data Capture

1.1 The Critical State of U.S. Infrastructure and the Inspection Burden

The need for accelerated and improved infrastructure monitoring is immediate and critical across the United States. According to comprehensive reports, the nation possesses over 617,000 bridges, many of which exceed 50 years in age. This aging infrastructure has led to a situation where 42% of U.S. bridges require repairs, and 7.5% are officially classified as structurally deficient.9 This condition highlights a pervasive structural integrity challenge that demands effective and frequent condition monitoring.

Historically, traditional monitoring methods utilized by Departments of Transportation (DOTs) have been inherently expensive, labor-intensive, and time-consuming.9 Inspection of complex infrastructure often requires high-risk procedures, such as inspectors climbing superstructures, or the deployment of high-cost, specialized equipment like large snooper trucks, which can cost upwards of $800,000 per unit.5 These legacy methods create bottlenecks, limit inspection frequency, and expose maintenance crews to unacceptable levels of risk. UAS technology is now positioned as the transformative digital catalyst capable of offering an innovative and efficient solution to this mounting structural deficit.9

1.2 The Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) Initiative: Establishing a National Model

The Ohio Department of Transportation recognized that modernization required a synchronized approach to technology integration. Under the umbrella of the state’s DriveOhio initiative, ODOT positioned Uncrewed Aircraft Systems and autonomous/connected ground vehicles as parallel technologies, leveraging resources from both sectors collaboratively to make smarter decisions and avoid duplicative efforts.11 This strategic framework established UAS not as an isolated tool, but as an integral component of the future transportation ecosystem.

The ODOT UAS program has rapidly achieved maturity, evolving from what began as a handful of bridge inspectors piloting basic drones into a sophisticated, statewide initiative.10 The organization established a dedicated UAS Center and now fields over 40 trained drone operators deployed across the state.10 This comprehensive implementation initiative has standardized the use of UAS to streamline critical infrastructure workflows, including construction monitoring, survey capture, and high-risk bridge inspections. The program’s institutional growth—supported by dedicated teams in the UAS Center, GIS, Survey, and Bridge Inspection groups—ensures that the high-quality data collected is relevant and accessible to all functional areas, enabling the department to respond to emerging issues in near real time.10

1.3 Scope of UAS Workflows within ODOT

ODOT’s strategic deployment of UAS technology spans multiple critical areas of operation, effectively replacing legacy equipment and outdated field methods.10 The primary workflows include:

  • Bridge and Infrastructure Inspections: Focused on high-risk elements and inaccessible areas, enabling the observation of detailed defects like cracks and section loss using advanced imaging capabilities.10
  • Construction Progress Monitoring: Providing updated views of project sites for construction engineers, tracking compliance, and verifying adherence to design specifications.10
  • Survey-grade Mapping: Collecting precise geospatial data necessary for engineering and planning.10
  • Traffic Pattern Analysis and Emergency Response: Offering immediate aerial views during incidents and storm response.10

A critical element of this program’s success is the investment in human capital. ODOT is actively investing in building internal capacity by offering free online UAS knowledge courses through the Ohio Local Technical Assistance Program (LTAP).14 This training prepares participants to take the necessary certification exams, thereby embedding UAS capability directly into the standard skillset of existing staff, including bridge inspectors, surveyors, and GIS analysts.10

This institutional approach to workforce development is not merely training; it constitutes a scalable strategy designed to address national labor shortages in specialized infrastructure fields.4 By training regional staff internally, ODOT transforms itself from a consumer of expensive external drone services into a self-sufficient, resilient UAS operator. This centralized control over training and operations ensures standardized data quality and allows for rapid, standardized deployment across all regions, significantly maximizing operational agility and control over data standards.

III. Chapter 2: Operational Acceleration: Specialized Deployment and Post-Disaster Efficacy

2.1 ODOT Bridge Inspection Workflows: Hardware Specialization and Autonomy

ODOT’s ability to accelerate inspection workflows is directly attributable to the strategic selection and specialization of its UAS fleet, coupled with autonomous flight capabilities. Recognizing that no single platform fits every scenario, ODOT utilizes tailored hardware for specific needs.10

The department relies on sophisticated platforms like the Skydio X10 for demanding technical tasks, including high-resolution mapping and thermal scans that require RTK (Real-Time Kinematic) precision.10 This reliance on RTK precision is a significant commitment to structural metrology, which extends beyond simple visual documentation. High-resolution 3D models and point clouds derived from this RTK data enable engineers to capture precise, repeatable measurements of structural features. This standardization facilitates the accurate tracking of deterioration rates over mandated inspection cycles.

Conversely, ODOT utilizes the Skydio 2+ for operations in confined spaces. This platform is ideal for tight, under-bridge inspections where GPS signals are often challenged by physical obstruction and proximity to concrete and steel elements.10 The autonomous flight capabilities of both platforms are essential, replacing manual field methods and allowing inspectors to safely and effectively collect comprehensive visual data, observing critical defects like cracks and section loss.10

The commitment to RTK accuracy ensures that subsequent drone flights capture data referenced to the exact same spatial coordinates. This highly accurate geo-referencing allows advanced Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) platforms to automatically calculate the precise rate of defect propagation (e.g., crack growth or foundation settling). This methodology elevates the inspection process from qualitative reporting to quantitative, predictive engineering analysis, forming the basis of a modern maintenance program.

2.2 UAS in Post-Disaster Damage Assessment (FEMA Context)

UAS technology is equally critical in the domain of post-disaster recovery, particularly in the context of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) operations and local emergency management. The more accurate and timely the information received from the damage assessment process, the more expediently disaster declarations can be made, which is essential for unlocking crucial federal relief funds.15

UAS facilitates the rapid evaluation of major areas of concern, including immediate life safety threats, hazards, property loss, and damage to critical infrastructure such as water treatment plants.15 The deployment of drones minimizes the crucial period between a disaster strike and the acquisition of actionable intelligence, a scenario referred to as reducing the disaster information void. The ability of UAS to deploy immediately and safely minimizes assessment cycle time, which is essential for optimizing the deployment of limited recovery resources and preventing cascading failures of critical, interconnected systems.6

Importantly, UAS allows responders to safely obtain information about bridge components and other critical assets without risking personnel or requiring cumbersome, expensive traditional equipment in potentially unstable or inaccessible environments.6 This non-intrusive method allows engineers located remotely to quickly assess the condition and determine whether a more detailed, hands-on inspection is warranted, accelerating diagnostic turnaround.6

Furthermore, legal and operational planning for UAS deployment necessitates full transparency with the public. Emergency Management Directors note that if the public is aware of the use of this technology, they will be more inclined to trust the operations, addressing potential legal ramifications and fostering citizen trust during highly sensitive post-disaster data collection.15

IV. Chapter 3: Quantifying the Return on Investment (ROI): Efficiency and Cost Metrics

The implementation of UAS programs yields quantifiable benefits across operational velocity, direct cost reduction, and minimized externalities. These metrics demonstrate a clear return on investment (ROI) that justifies the wide-scale adoption of the technology.

3.1 Documented Reductions in Inspection Time (Operational Velocity)

UAV-based inspections offer transformative gains in operational velocity compared to manual or traditional methods. Industry studies consistently confirm that the deployment of drones reduces overall field inspection time by up to 70%.4 For complex assets, this acceleration can reach as high as 75%, effectively validating the “5x faster” metric sought by the query.2 For example, in the inspection of wind turbines, drones have demonstrated the ability to reduce man-hours and turbine downtime by over 75%, completing inspections per turbine in 15 to 30 minutes.1

The ability of drones to complete complex structural tasks in a matter of hours compared to the days required by traditional equipment, such as snooper trucks, provides immediate and significant time savings.2 This acceleration is further enhanced by the collection of real-time data, which allows inspectors to make quicker judgments, streamlining workflows and accelerating diagnostics via automated data capture and processing platforms.16

3.2 Direct Cost Comparisons and Measured Savings

The quantifiable cost reduction associated with UAS deployment provides a compelling financial case for public agencies. Industry studies confirm that drone inspections lower costs by 40% to 60% compared to traditional manual inspections.4

This is robustly confirmed by state DOT programs. The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), for instance, calculated a decisive 40% cost savings using drones.3 A specific comparative analysis by MnDOT showed that the average cost to inspect a bridge using traditional methods was approximately $40,800. A comparable inspection conducted with sUAS assistance cost significantly less, averaging $19,900.3 This substantial reduction is achieved primarily by eliminating the high operational costs associated with traditional methods, including labor, traffic control setup, and equipment rental fees.

Furthermore, UAS deployment avoids significant capital and operational expenditure (CapEx and OpEx) related to heavy machinery. Snooper trucks and similar legacy equipment carry a high capital cost, often ranging from $200,000 to over $800,000. In contrast, capable drone fleets represent an initial capital outlay in the range of “a few thousand” dollars.5 This difference translates to a massive reduction in the cost per inspection, with some estimates suggesting drones reduce the cost per inspection by 75% compared to operating heavy machinery.5

3.3 Modeling the Long-Term Financial Benefit of Predictive Maintenance

The immediate cost savings are amplified by the long-term benefits of enhanced asset management. By enabling predictive maintenance, agencies can avoid the exponential costs associated with reactive failure management. AI capabilities integrated with drone data allow agencies to instantaneously pinpoint anomalies, enabling them to proactively mitigate structural risks rather than react to expensive failures.16

To standardize and justify these large-scale technology investments, sophisticated quantitative methods are employed. Research highlights the utility of multi-dimensional frameworks that use statistical models and Monte Carlo simulations to conduct extensive cost–benefit analyses, informing the strategic decision-making process for large-scale drone investment.9 Sensitivity analyses further evaluate how technological progress and variations in drone costs will influence the widespread adoption of the technology in the future.9

Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Infrastructure Inspection Efficiency

MetricTraditional Inspection (Example: Snooper Truck)UAS-Assisted InspectionEfficiency GainSource Context
Inspection Cost (Average)~$40,800 per bridge 3~$19,900 per bridge 340% to 60% reduction 2Elimination of equipment rental, labor, and traffic control costs.
Field Inspection Time ReductionDays to Weeks (Depending on complexity)Measured in hours (Up to 75% faster) 13x to 5x AccelerationReduced man-hours and increased area coverage speed.
Required Capital EquipmentSnooper Trucks ($200k – $800k+) 5UAS Fleet ($thousands) 5Significant reduction in initial CapExLower operational barrier to entry and higher scalability.
Traffic Disruption / Lane ClosuresHigh and Mandatory 5Low to Negligible 17Near 100% reduction in major traffic impedanceImproves public safety and reduces external operational costs.

A significant, yet often unquantified, financial benefit is the reduction in negative economic externalities associated with traffic disruption. The elimination of mandatory lane closures required for deploying large equipment like snooper trucks is paramount.5 By preserving traffic mobility, minimizing congestion-related air pollution, and reducing delays, UAS technology supports a broader mandate for public infrastructure management, providing non-monetary ROI that policy-makers value highly in planning urban maintenance schedules.18

V. Chapter 4: Risk Management and Public Safety Enhancement

The displacement of high-risk inspection methods by remote UAS operations constitutes one of the most compelling arguments for widespread adoption, yielding profound public safety and worker risk management benefits.

4.1 Mitigating Inspector Exposure: The Safety Dividend

Traditional inspection protocols inherently expose personnel to high-frequency, high-severity hazards, including falls, traffic accidents, and the operation of heavy machinery. Inspectors previously had to rely on cumbersome equipment or physically climb superstructures, forcing them to operate in dangerous conditions, often likened to “playing Frogger in the middle of the road”.10

Drones fundamentally alter this risk profile by eliminating the need for inspectors to engage in high-risk activities. For critical procedures, such as bridge-under-deck inspections, UAS imagery provides the necessary vantage point while inspectors remain safely on the ground or within protected areas.6 This is particularly vital when accessing hard-to-reach areas above roadways or over water, dramatically reducing fall and struck-by hazards.17 In post-disaster scenarios, drones serve as essential first responders, enabling personnel to quickly and safely assess damaged assets and identify immediate life safety threats remotely, mitigating the risk of deploying crews into unstable or hazardous environments.6

The ability of UAS to capture high-definition photos from previously inaccessible areas means that the technology not only removes personnel from danger but also provides superior, non-intrusive methods to quantify the risk posed by the structure itself.18 Advanced sensors, such as thermal imaging, can pinpoint hidden structural issues like water ingress or material degradation that traditional visual inspections might overlook.2 This data enables proactive, targeted maintenance, directly enhancing public safety by preventing structural failures before they become critical.

4.2 Reduction of Public Inconvenience and Environmental Impact

The non-intrusive operational footprint of UAS significantly benefits the public. Traditional methods necessitate extensive traffic control, including lane closures, to accommodate heavy equipment like snooper trucks. Drone operation eliminates this disruption, preserving traffic flow and removing the public inconvenience and associated safety risks caused by major traffic impedance.5

Furthermore, the technology contributes positively to environmental stewardship. By reducing the need for lengthy traffic control measures and minimizing congestion, drone inspections lower the environmental impact associated with traffic disruption, including a reduction in air pollution caused by idling vehicles.18

4.3 Regulatory Alignment and Best Practices

The shift toward UAS operations is fully supported by major regulatory and professional bodies. Evaluations by agencies, including the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and guidance from the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), confirm that UAVs are an effective tool for bridge inspectors. The consensus is that drones reduce safety risks to inspectors and minimize inconvenience to the public while simultaneously providing high-quality detail essential for mandated inspections.19 The high-fidelity data captured by drones also facilitates the democratization of remote expertise. Comprehensive damage assessments can be captured in detail, enabling structural experts located remotely to review the data, speed up diagnostic turnaround, and reduce the time and expense associated with deploying specialized engineers to every single inspection site.6

VI. Chapter 5: Geospatial Integration: UAS Data, GIS, and Predictive Asset Management

The successful implementation and scalability of state DOT UAS programs hinge on an effective strategy for managing the enormous velocity and volume of data generated, integrating it into actionable enterprise systems for asset management and compliance reporting.

5.1 Managing Data Velocity and Volume: The Necessity of Automation

A key technical challenge, often cited as an “unintended consequence” of UAS operations, is the sheer volume of high-resolution imagery and associated data that must be reviewed, processed, and categorized.21 Manual review of thousands of images for a single structure creates a new bottleneck.

Addressing this data overload necessitates advanced automation. The reliance on automated imagery analytics and Artificial Intelligence (AI) platforms is paramount to efficiently process and categorize defects, transforming raw images into structured, actionable intelligence suitable for regulatory reports.21 AI algorithms analyze the vast datasets collected by drones, detecting potential issues and enabling the rapid calculation of repair prioritization.

5.2 The Critical Nexus: Integrating Drone Imagery into Enterprise GIS Systems

Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) provide the essential framework for structuring and analyzing UAS data. GIS technology captures, manages, analyzes, and presents geographical data, making it the backbone for modern asset management.23

For transportation agencies, high-resolution drone imagery, particularly data captured with RTK precision, is seamlessly integrated into enterprise GIS platforms (such as ArcGIS Reality).10 This geo-referenced compliance ensures that inspection findings are spatially accurate and linked directly to the specific asset coordinates, which is essential for FHWA compliance reporting.20

This integration allows for the creation of comprehensive situational awareness. Drone data, which provides unparalleled precision for localized, asset-specific inspections of bridges or culverts, is layered with broader contextual data from street-level or satellite imagery.13 This multi-source data integration facilitates spatial analytics that support informed decisions in public works and asset assessments.13

5.3 Prioritizing Repairs and Resource Allocation

The combination of UAS data and GIS enables agencies to move away from calendar-based maintenance cycles toward data-driven, risk-based prioritization. GIS analysis is utilized to combine detailed UAS inspection findings (e.g., precise location and severity of structural defects) with critical operational factors such as average daily traffic volume, asset age, and maintenance history.23

This process generates predictive models that accurately prioritize repairs, optimizing resource allocation and ensuring capital is directed toward the structurally deficient assets presenting the greatest risk. Furthermore, GIS facilitates the creation of 3D models and visualization tools that are critical for tracking construction progress, verifying adherence to design specifications, and simplifying the demanding requirements of federal compliance reporting.13

5.4 Building the Digital Twin: The Future of Long-Term Asset Monitoring

The most advanced application of UAS data integration is the creation of Digital Twins—virtual, explorable 3D environments that serve as exact digital replicas of physical assets.7 The process involves transforming drone scans (utilizing photogrammetry software like Pix4Dmapper) into high-resolution 3D models.22 These models, built on open standards, integrate various data sources, including LiDAR 3D data, color video, and thermal imaging.7

The Digital Twin forms the core of a drone-assisted Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) system. By integrating continuous sensor data into the EAM system, agencies establish a robust data repository for long-term analysis and maintenance planning.8 This strategic integration establishes permanent, objective institutional memory regarding asset condition, moving away from reliance on siloed individual inspector notes toward a consistent, centralized digital record that can track deterioration trends over a decade, significantly de-risking long-term infrastructure planning.

The maturation of this system allows for automated change detection. The EAM platform uses AI to analyze sequential drone data images over time, detecting even minute differences in the asset’s structural integrity. When predefined thresholds of change are met, the system automatically triggers alerts and generates preventive, corrective, and predictive maintenance schedules.8

The use of drone-generated 3D models extends beyond maintenance prioritization; it becomes a fundamental tool for planning subsequent repair or retrofit construction.22 Accurate 3D models provide precise measurements necessary for detailed engineering design, accelerating the design phase, reducing construction risk (by ensuring better fit-up), and providing necessary monitoring tools for tracking compliance and progress during the construction lifecycle.13

Table 2: Strategic Benefits Matrix: Safety, Data Quality, and Resilience

Strategic Benefit AreaTraditional Method LimitationUAS Program Outcome (ODOT/FEMA)Policy Implication
Worker Safety/Risk ExposureHigh risk from traffic and heights (e.g., using snooper trucks) 10Remote operation maintains inspector safety at ground level 6Eliminates high-frequency, high-severity safety hazards for employees.
Data Quality and FidelityLimited by visual access; non-metrological 9High-Resolution Imagery, Thermal, RTK GPS Precision 2Enables structural metrology and detection of hidden material issues (e.g., moisture ingress).
Disaster Assessment SpeedSlow, often delayed due to physical access constraints 15Rapid, safe acquisition of initial damage data within hours 6Expedites critical decision-making and federal disaster declarations/funding.
Asset Management MaturityReactive maintenance based on calendar cyclesPredictive maintenance via Digital Twins and automated change detection 7Maximizes asset lifespan and optimizes capital expenditure planning.

VII. Conclusions and Strategic Recommendations

The experience of the Ohio DOT and disaster response pilots related to FEMA methodologies unequivocally confirms that UAS technology is not merely a tool but a foundational element of modern infrastructure management and disaster resilience. The transition from legacy inspection methods—characterized by high risk, high cost, and limited data fidelity—to autonomous, data-rich UAS operations has been demonstrably successful, yielding verified time reductions of up to 75% and cost savings of 40% to 60%.

The strategic value of these programs extends beyond operational efficiency. The primary benefits include a dramatic improvement in worker and public safety by eliminating traffic disruption and removing personnel from hazardous environments, fulfilling a paramount governmental mandate. Furthermore, the integration of UAS data with GIS and AI enables advanced capabilities such as structural metrology and automated change detection, moving asset management from a reactive framework to a proactive, predictive model.

To fully leverage the transformative capabilities demonstrated by leading agencies, the following strategic recommendations are essential for continued scalability and maximized ROI:

  1. Standardize Geospatial Integration for EAM: Public agencies should mandate the integration of UAS data (3D models, point clouds, and imagery) directly into common Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) platforms and GIS systems. Standardization, particularly around RTK precision and geo-referencing protocols, is necessary to ensure data from different regions and flights is comparable for long-term change detection analysis.
  2. Invest in Internal Expertise and Scaling: Following ODOT’s model, agencies should prioritize internal capability building through standardized training and certification programs. Building a localized, expert fleet of internal operators addresses the national labor shortage in specialized fields and guarantees control over data quality and mission standardization, ensuring the long-term sustainability of the program.
  3. Advance AI-Driven Analytics: To counter the “data overload” associated with high-volume UAS imagery, investment must be prioritized in automated imagery analytics and machine learning tools. This shift is critical for accelerating the review process and transforming raw data into actionable repair prioritization schedules and compliance reports at scale.
  4. Adopt Digital Twin Frameworks: Agencies should begin transitioning infrastructure planning toward Digital Twin models. These virtual replicas, derived from multi-sensor drone data (LiDAR, thermal, visual), represent the pinnacle of predictive asset management, allowing for simulated repair scenarios and optimizing the timing and scope of capital projects based on highly accurate, objective data.

Works cited

  1. How Can You Measure the ROI of Your Utilities Inspection Program Using Drones?, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.commercialuavnews.com/energy/how-can-you-measure-the-roi-of-your-utilities-inspection-program-using-drones
  2. Drone for Bridge Inspection: Benefits, Top Models, and Regulations – JOUAV, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.jouav.com/blog/drone-for-bridge-inspection.html
  3. Drones for State DOTs: Real-World Benefits, Use Cases and ROI – DARTdrones, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.dartdrones.com/drones-for-state-department-of-transportations/
  4. Drone Infrastructure Inspection for Bridges, Roads and Buildings – DSLRPros, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.dslrpros.com/blogs/drone-trends/drone-infrastructure-inspection-for-bridges-roads-and-buildings
  5. Why autonomous drones are ideal for bridge inspection | Skydio, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.skydio.com/blog/drone-autonomy-for-bridge-inspection-skydio
  6. Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) for Bridge Inspection Safety – MDPI, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2504-446X/4/3/40
  7. From 3D Drone Scans to Digital Twins: The Accelerator Awards – Bentley Blog, accessed October 27, 2025, https://blog.bentley.com/insights/from-drone-scans-to-digital-twins-bentley-accelerator-awards-250000-to-startups-using-3d-tech-for-infrastructure/
  8. Drone-assisted asset management by Infor and Deloitte, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/de/de/Industries/industrial-construction/perspectives/drone-assisted-asset-management.html
  9. Cost Efficiency and Effectiveness of Drone Applications in Bridge Condition Monitoring, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/10/3/63
  10. Skydio Customer Success Stories – ODOT, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.skydio.com/customer-stories/Ohio-Department-of-transportation
  11. Uncrewed Aircraft Systems (UAS) Center – DriveOhio, accessed October 27, 2025, https://drive.ohio.gov/programs/aam/uas
  12. Ohio UAS Dashboard – DriveOhio, accessed October 27, 2025, https://drive.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/driveohio/programs/aam/uas/ohio-uas-dashboard
  13. How to Leverage Multiple Imagery Sources for Comprehensive Decision-Making in Public Works and Asset Management – NCTech, accessed October 27, 2025, https://nctechimaging.com/how-to-leverage-multiple-imagery-sources-for-comprehensive-decision-making-in-public-works-and-asset-management/
  14. ODOT offering free online Unmanned Aircraft Systems knowledge courses | Ohio Department of Transportation, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.transportation.ohio.gov/wps/portal/gov/odot/about-us/news/statewide/odot-offering-free-online-uas-knowledge-courses
  15. Examining the Use of Unmanned Aerial Devices To Conduct Damage Assessment in the City of Norfolk, accessed October 27, 2025, https://apps.usfa.fema.gov/pdf/efop/efo239411.pdf
  16. Transforming Field Operations with AI Drone Inspection Services | Deloitte US, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/Industries/energy/articles/ai-field-solutions-drone-power-line-inspection.html
  17. 6 Benefits of Using Drones for Civil Infrastructure Inspections – Geoversity™, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.geoversity.io/stories/1217919/6-benefits-of-using-drones-for-civil-infrastructure-inspections/
  18. AI-Based Bridge and Road Inspection Framework Using Drones – Mineta Transportation Institute, accessed October 27, 2025, https://transweb.sjsu.edu/sites/default/files/2226-Kulhandjian-AI-Bridge-Road-Inspection-Drones.pdf
  19. Unmanned Aerial Vehicles Enable Safe and Cost-Effective Bridge Inspection, accessed October 27, 2025, https://transportation.org/uas-aam/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2023/05/201540TS.pdf
  20. Collection of Data With Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) for Bridge Inspection and Construction Inspection , September 2021 – FHWA-HRT-21-086, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/structures/bridge/21086/index.cfm
  21. Data Management and Governance in Unmanned Aircraft Systems Tech Brief – Federal Highway Administration, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/uas/resources/hif23055.pdf
  22. The Sky’s the Limit: Leveraging Drone Technology in Infrastructure Projects, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.gihub.org/articles/the-skys-the-limit-leveraging-drone-technology-in-infrastructure-projects/
  23. Advancements and Applications of Drone-Integrated Geographic Information System Technology—A Review – MDPI, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/20/5039
  24. Drone Mapping Software | Extract Insights from Drone Data – Esri, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-reality/platform/drone-mapping