I. Executive Summary: Governance, Risk, and the Triple Bottom Line

1.1 Introduction to the Aerial Advantage

The proactive management of common area assets is the single greatest determinant of long-term fiscal health and resident satisfaction within a Homeowners Association (HOA) or Condominium Association. Traditionally, roof and exterior structural inspections rely on manual, time-consuming, and dangerous access methods. However, the adoption of routine aerial surveys, utilizing Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) or drones, represents a critical technological pivot for modern governance. This shift moves property management beyond a reactive framework, wherein repairs only occur after failure, into a proactive model of asset preservation. Aerial technology provides objective, repeatable, and high-definition documentation of property condition, transforming an association’s ability to anticipate maintenance needs and defend its operational decisions.

1.2 The Board’s Mandate

HOA Boards of Directors are bound by a stringent fiduciary duty to maintain, repair, and replace common elements and common areas.¹ This obligation mandates implementing best practices to extend the useful life of these components.¹ Crucially, the duty of due diligence requires directors to conduct reasonable inquiry into maintenance issues and reserve components before making financial or enforcement decisions.² Traditional inspection methods often provide subjective or intermittent snapshots of property condition. In contrast, routine aerial data provides the continuous, objective, and verifiable evidence necessary to fulfill this fundamental duty, providing irrefutable proof of proactive management and diligent oversight.³

1.3 Key Financial, Safety, and Legal Outcomes

The integration of routine aerial assessments delivers strategic benefits across three essential pillars of community governance:

1. Fiscal Stability (No Surprises): By identifying minor defects early, drone surveys eliminate the potential for costly surprises and structural failures that lead to extensive, unplanned repairs. This strategic preventative maintenance stabilizes the reserve fund and eliminates the need for burdensome special assessments.⁴
2. Risk Mitigation (No Ladders): By removing the necessity for human inspectors to access dangerous, elevated structures, the HOA eliminates exposure to catastrophic contractor injury claims, mitigating significant legal and financial liability.⁵
3. Accelerated Recovery (No Disputes): Comprehensive, pre-loss aerial condition reports accelerate insurance claims processing, potentially reducing claim cycle times by 30% to 60%. This superior documentation minimizes disputes with adjusters and secures faster settlements, ensuring swift community restoration.⁶

II. Financial Stewardship: Protecting the Reserve and Preventing Special Assessments

2.1 The Calculus of Neglect: Proactive vs. Reactive Maintenance Costs

One of the most disruptive financial events for any shared-ownership community is the implementation of a special assessment. These financial levies are generally required to cover extensive, unplanned repairs or complete replacements necessitated by chronic underfunding or deferred maintenance of common elements, particularly roofs.⁴ Special assessments impose an unexpected financial burden on homeowners and are a major source of conflict and dissatisfaction within the community.⁸

Best practices for roof asset management mandate frequent inspections, typically semi-annually (spring and fall), supplemented by post-storm checks.⁸ Aerial surveys offer an efficient and cost-effective method to achieve this necessary frequency.⁹ Early detection, such as identifying a few missing shingles, localized gutter debris, or minor flashing failures, prevents these small problems from escalating into major structural damage, widespread water intrusion, or premature roof replacement.⁸ This proactive approach demonstrably reduces long-term expenses.⁸

A key strategic advantage of routine aerial assessment is the shift it enables in asset management philosophy: converting potential high-cost future capital expenditures (CapEx) into predictable, low-cost operational expenditures (OpEx). If maintenance is deferred, a minor defect that could have been addressed with a simple, inexpensive repair (OpEx, perhaps $500 to $2,000) may lead to premature structural failure, forcing an unplanned major CapEx expenditure (e.g., a $100,000 repair or replacement) that depletes reserves.¹⁰ By utilizing drone surveys, which are significantly less expensive than traditional inspection methods ⁹, the association ensures that assets reach their full expected lifespan, typically 20 to 30 years.⁸

The continuous documentation of roof condition allows for reserve fund studies to rely on the actual documented health of the common elements, rather than relying solely on generalized lifespan estimates. Successfully extending the life of a roof system by even a few years through verifiable maintenance drastically reduces the required annual depreciation rate and the necessary annual reserve contribution. This practice minimizes unexpected volatility in the budget, ensuring the reserve fund remains adequately funded and thereby fulfilling the goal of avoiding special assessments. The financial benefit is immediate and serves as a direct stabilizing factor for the community’s budget.

Table 1: Financial Impact: Proactive vs. Reactive Roof Management

Risk Scenario	Detection Method	Cost Type and Magnitude	HOA Financial Impact
Minor Defect (Missing Shingle/Clog)	Drone Survey (Routine/Post-Storm) 8	Low OpEx: Small repair/cleaning ($500 – $2,000) 10	Maximizes roof lifespan (20-30 years); Avoids internal water damage.
Catastrophic Failure (Deferred Leak)	Reactive Notice (Resident Complaint)	High CapEx: Unplanned structural repair, interior damage, mold remediation (>$20,000) 4	Triggers Special Assessment, depleting reserves; Increases future insurance premiums.
Inspection Cost	Manual, Manned Inspection (High Risk)	High Liability OpEx: High labor costs, plus inherent risk of $68k+ injury claim 11	Drone Survey reduces inspection cost and liability to the thousands of pounds/dollars range.9

III. Mitigating Human Risk: The Safety Imperative and Liability Shield

3.1 Quantifying the Danger: The Cost of Manual Access

The elimination of physical inspection risk is one of the most critical legal and ethical obligations addressed by aerial technology. Ladder-related injuries represent a serious national crisis. Annually in the United States, over 500,000 individuals receive medical treatment, and approximately 300 people die due to ladder-related incidents.⁵ The societal cost of these injuries is staggering, estimated at $24 billion per year, encompassing work loss, medical treatment, legal fees, liability, and pain and suffering.⁵

For community associations, the risk is concentrated among high-exposure service providers. Workers employed in construction, maintenance, and repair, including roofing contractors, experience significantly elevated rates of falls from ladders.⁵ When an accident occurs involving elevated work, the resulting claims are catastrophically expensive. Falls from elevations by roofers generate average lost-time claims costing approximately $106,000 each, while falls specifically from ladders or scaffolds cost roofers an average of $68,000 per lost-time claim.¹¹ These figures represent the direct costs associated with medical care (approximately $43,000) and indemnity (wage replacement, approximately $25,000).¹¹

3.2 Strategic Risk Transfer: From Physical Risk to Digital Documentation

Utilizing drones for routine inspections fundamentally changes the risk exposure profile of the community. Drone surveys eliminate the need for human personnel to ascend ladders or traverse dangerous, elevated, or hard-to-reach common area roofs.³ This technological substitution is a direct safety measure.

While contractors carry Workers’ Compensation insurance, the HOA is not automatically shielded from liability. The association can still be exposed to litigation, even by third-party contractors, if negligence is alleged, such as failure to maintain safe common areas or failure to warn of known hazards.³ When a Board chooses to implement a drone survey instead of a manual inspection, it generates powerful, documented proof of a safety-conscious decision, demonstrating due diligence in minimizing risk exposure.

The investment in a routine, professional drone survey, which typically costs less than $5,000 ⁹, functions as a high-return premium liability hedge. By incurring this small operational expenditure, the association actively mitigates the potential for a high-cost, high-severity event—a contractor fall claim, which starts at $68,000.¹¹ This is not merely an operational cost; it is a defensive financial strategy.

Furthermore, drone records serve a crucial function as proactive legal documentation. If an accident occurs involving a contractor performing repair work, the HOA may be exposed if it failed to inspect the premises prior to the incident. If the association can demonstrate through prior, time-stamped drone records that it had conducted a thorough, non-invasive assessment, or that it had specifically identified a known hazard (e.g., damaged decking or broken component) and hired the contractor specifically to remedy that documented issue, the Board proves its diligence in managing the risk. Conversely, the absence of regular inspection records can be interpreted as a failure to reasonably inquire into common element maintenance, potentially increasing the Board’s exposure to negligence claims.³

Table 2: Mitigating Inspection Liability: Cost Comparison (Manned vs. Aerial)

Risk Activity	Annual Frequency	Average Cost of Single Injury Claim (Medical + Indemnity)	HOA Liability Profile
Roofer Fall from Ladder/Scaffold	Varies; High-risk exposure	$68,000 to $106,000	Extreme (Potential for negligence suit, high General Liability claims, and premium increase) 3
Annual Drone Inspection/Survey	Routine, Semi-Annual, Post-Storm	Operational cost of professional survey (Typically <$5,000) 9	Minimal (Risk shifts to manageable FAA/privacy compliance) 12
National Annual Cost of Ladder Injuries	N/A	$24 Billion 5	Mitigation of this societal cost through elimination of elevation exposure.

IV. Insurance Optimization: Premium Leverage and Accelerated Recovery

4.1 Underwriting Diligence and Premium Reduction

Insurance carriers maintain a primary interest in loss prevention; they are highly motivated to reduce the frequency and severity of claims.¹³ As such, insurers often offer “property related discounts” based on an assessment of the overall condition and exterior maintenance level of the community buildings and common areas.¹³

Routine aerial surveys provide the objective, verifiable data needed to leverage these discounts. This comprehensive digital record confirms the association’s commitment to proactive maintenance and risk reduction. HOAs that consistently conduct regular property maintenance and strategic upgrades to reduce risk are significantly more attractive to underwriters, potentially leading to lower insurance costs.¹⁴

The high-resolution imagery captured by drones can identify potential risks—such as early signs of roof deterioration, blocked drainage, or tree limbs overhanging structures—that underwriters use to predict and prevent losses.¹⁵ By proactively identifying and correcting these issues before the insurer initiates its own inspection process (which can sometimes lead to non-renewal or cancellation warnings) ¹⁵, the association establishes itself as a preferred risk, positioning itself for the best possible master policy rates.

4.2 Accelerating the Claims Cycle Post-Casualty

In the unfortunate event of a major weather casualty, the association’s documentation package becomes paramount for the speed and successful resolution of claims. Drone technology fundamentally revolutionizes this process by providing comprehensive digital workflows that replace traditional, slower manual assessments.⁷

The immediate benefit is a substantial reduction in the claims cycle time—the duration from the initial notice of loss to final settlement. National insurers have reported that the utilization of drone technology reduces the claims cycle time by 30% to 40%.⁶ In some advanced digital workflows, this reduction can reach as high as 60%.⁷ Additionally, the comprehensive nature of drone-generated data packages can cut reinspection costs for the carrier by up to 50%.⁷ These efficiencies translate directly into quicker settlements for the policyholder.

The quality of documentation acts as a vital dispute minimization tool. Post-storm claims often face delays when adjusters allege that existing maintenance issues contributed to the loss. However, historical, pre-loss aerial surveys establish an irrefutable baseline of the property’s prior condition, making it extremely difficult for the insurer to deny a claim based on unsubstantiated allegations of chronic neglect. High-definition, timestamped visual evidence provides clarity, minimizing common disagreements over policy interpretation.⁶

The rapid acceleration of the claims process has a significant financial ripple effect for the community. When a master policy claim is delayed, the necessary repair funds are often stalled in escrow accounts, halting the restoration of common elements.¹⁶ This delay can lead to secondary damage (such as widespread mold growth), increased reconstruction costs, and, critically, resident frustration that can spiral into litigation against the Board for perceived delays in property restoration. By cutting the claim cycle time by 30-60%, drone records ensure faster fund release, mitigating further damage and reducing the exposure to internal legal challenges. Furthermore, immediate post-disaster aerial documentation provides the HOA with an accurate, objective baseline of the damage, which is essential for identifying and avoiding deceitful contractors who frequently prey on storm-damaged communities.¹⁶

Table 3: Impact of Drone Documentation on Claims Processing Efficiency

Metric	Traditional Manual Assessment	Drone-Data Assisted Claim	Significance for HOA
Claims Cycle Time Reduction	Varies widely	Reduced by 30%–60% 6	Faster restoration of common elements; minimized resident disruption and secondary damage.
Reinspection Costs	High cost and time overhead	Reduced by up to 50% 7	Efficiency savings translate to better insurer relationships and quicker final settlement determination.
Objective Evidence Quality	Subjective; limited ground photos	High-definition, timestamped digital workflow 6	Strong legal defense against maintenance neglect accusations; reduced likelihood of litigation.

V. Legal and Governance Compliance: Proof of Diligence

5.1 Fulfilling Fiduciary Duties Through Documented Due Diligence

Community association directors hold a duty of due diligence, which requires them to conduct reasonable inquiries into the condition of all common elements and maintenance requirements before making financial decisions.² Routine drone inspections offer a technologically superior and highly effective method for satisfying this duty compared to outdated visual ground checks or intermittent vendor reports. Aerial data provides granular, visual evidence of the status of shared assets, fulfilling the board’s mandate to investigate maintenance issues thoroughly.²

The creation of comprehensive aerial records is critical for safeguarding the Board against claims of mismanagement or failure to enforce rules. Detailed documentation proves that the board is acting “in good faith, not arbitrary or capricious” when setting maintenance budgets, enforcing maintenance covenants, or leveling charges for damage.¹⁸ This impartial, time-stamped visual evidence provides the association’s strongest defense against lawsuits initiated by disgruntled residents who allege selective enforcement or arbitrary decision-making.¹⁸

The power of non-invasive, objective evidence also streamlines internal dispute resolution. When conflicts arise regarding the condition of common area components—for example, if a homeowner claims that structural damage is not their responsibility—drone records provide objective data that is far more compelling in mediation or court than subjective claims or conflicting manual reports. This documentation proves active management and prudent financial oversight to both unit owners and external stakeholders.

5.2 Vendor Oversight and Quality Assurance

Drone technology facilitates superior oversight of third-party vendors, reducing the risk of substandard work and ensuring contract compliance. HOAs can utilize regular drone imagery to monitor the progress and quality of contractor performance, verifying that tasks such as roofing repairs, sealant application, or gutter maintenance are completed properly and thoroughly.¹⁹

This digital oversight capability allows construction engineers or board members to review vendor work remotely or in real-time. By substituting manual, time-consuming, and expensive on-site supervision with the rapid capture and analysis of aerial images, the association significantly reduces administrative costs while improving quality assurance.²⁰ This mechanism ensures that the community is receiving the full value of its maintenance investment.

Furthermore, routine aerial surveys aid in ensuring compliance with local codes and mandated safety standards.¹ For instance, records verifying clear gutters and functional drainage systems directly contribute to code compliance regarding water management, preventing subsequent structural decay and foundation damage.

The commitment to robust, regularly archived drone reports demonstrates an institutional dedication to maintenance that extends beyond a standard reserve study. This level of verifiable asset preservation is increasingly valued by commercial insurers and prospective mortgage lenders, stabilizing unit values and potentially easing future financing requirements for residents by proving the structural health of shared-ownership buildings.

VI. Case Study in Resilience: Leveraging Ohio Casualty Loss Relief Programs (Ohio Focus)

6.1 Understanding Ohio DTE Form 26 and Casualty Loss Relief

For shared-ownership communities in Ohio, severe weather events necessitate not only immediate repairs and insurance claims but also an organized approach to property tax relief. Ohio law permits property owners to request a reduction in the taxable valuation of their property if it has been destroyed or damaged by casualty loss, such as fire, flood, or storm.²¹ This relief is accessed by filing DTE Form 26, the Application for Valuation Deduction for Destroyed or Damaged Real Property.²⁴

In shared-ownership structures, damage to common elements like roofs and building exteriors, which are typically held under the association’s title or assessed collectively, directly reduces the overall taxable value of the community. This collective reduction impacts the tax burden for all unit owners.²³

The effective utilization of this program hinges entirely on documentation and adherence to rigid deadlines. DTE Form 26 specifically requires the applicant to provide the date the damage occurred and the Estimated dollar amount of damage.²⁴ The filing deadlines are strict: the application must be filed by December 31st for damage occurring during the first nine months of the year, or by January 31st of the following year for damage that occurred in the last three months.²¹

6.2 Strategic Use of Aerial Data for Tax Proration

The timing of the casualty loss is paramount because the amount of the final valuation deduction is prorated based on the calendar quarter in which the damage occurred.²⁴ If the filing is late or the documentation is insufficient, the community may miss out on significant tax savings.

Immediate post-storm drone surveys provide the crucial, irrefutable documentation required for this process. The aerial imagery captures the precise date, location, and visual extent of the damage, definitively establishing the loss within the correct calendar quarter. This timely proof is essential for maximizing the proration benefit.

Furthermore, modern drone surveys, especially when paired with specialized estimation software, can rapidly generate the detailed, objective visual evidence and initial damage estimates required to complete Line 10 (“Estimated dollar amount of damage”) on DTE Form 26.²⁴ In the chaotic aftermath of a disaster, the speed with which the HOA can document and quantify the loss is vital for meeting the tight filing deadlines and securing tax valuation relief for the community, providing crucial financial support while potentially waiting months for insurance payouts to finalize. This makes aerial surveying a foundational component of the disaster recovery financial strategy.

For shared-ownership communities, the use of objective drone documentation provides critical evidence of shared loss affecting the collective assessed value of the property, thus justifying the collective application of this tax relief program.

VII. Strategic Recommendation and Implementation Roadmap

7.1 Policy Framework for Drone Integration

The Board is strongly advised to immediately integrate routine aerial surveying into its annual maintenance calendar. This action requires adherence to a defined policy framework to minimize new legal exposures, particularly related to privacy and federal aviation law.

• Commercial Compliance: It is imperative that the HOA recognizes that maintenance and inspection activities using drones constitute commercial use under Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulations.¹² Any drone operation must be conducted by individuals who possess a remote pilot airman certificate (Part 107 certification) and utilize drones registered with the FAA.¹² Violations of FAA rules can result in substantial civil penalties.¹² Outsourcing this task to a licensed and insured commercial operator is the safest mechanism for the association to ensure compliance and demonstrate due diligence.
• Mitigating Privacy Risk: While drones mitigate safety risks, they introduce new liability concerning privacy invasion and capturing unauthorized footage.³ The Board must adopt strict, written governance policies detailing the exact parameters for drone operations: where flights can occur, when they are scheduled, what data is captured (e.g., restricting views into private unit windows), and how the digital assets are stored and utilized.³ Clear community communication regarding these policies is necessary to preempt membership objections and disputes.¹²

7.2 Implementation and Archival Best Practices

A successful transition to aerial asset management requires robust implementation protocols:

• Routine Scheduling: Implement semi-annual surveys (e.g., late spring and late fall) to capture pre- and post-weather damage. Crucially, schedule immediate surveys following any severe weather event (e.g., high winds, major hail) to establish a forensic timeline of damage for insurance purposes.
• Archival Protocol: Implement a secure, cloud-based digital workflow for archiving all aerial data (high-resolution photos, thermal imaging, orthomosaic maps, and video). This timestamped evidence forms the institutional knowledge base, providing historical context for all maintenance decisions and serving as the foundational legal defense against future claims of neglect or arbitrary governance.
• Vendor Selection: The association must partner with specialized drone service providers who offer not only technical excellence (high-definition imagery, thermal mapping for water intrusion detection) but also the necessary FAA compliance infrastructure and comprehensive insurance coverage for both the aircraft and operations.¹²

7.3 Final Governance Conclusion: The Vision of the “No Surprises” Community

The decision to adopt routine aerial surveying technology is a modern imperative for responsible HOA governance. By leveraging this technology, the Board transitions from a position of reactive vulnerability to proactive control. The documented financial advantages—preventing costly special assessments by ensuring minor issues are addressed early, and securing accelerated claims settlements post-disaster—demonstrably protect the community’s budget. Furthermore, the commitment to safety by removing human inspectors from dangerous elevations dramatically reduces the HOA’s liability exposure to catastrophic injury claims. Routine aerial surveying is not an expense; it is an essential governance measure that guarantees fiscal stability, maximizes physical safety, and secures the legal standing of the association, fulfilling the promise of a community governed by diligence and transparency: no ladders, no disputes, no surprises.

Works cited

1. HOA Inspections: Maintaining Safety and Security – Condominium Associates, accessed October 27, 2025, https://condominiumassociates.com/blog/hoa-inspections-maintaining-safety-and-security
2. Fiduciary Duties of California HOA Directors – Davis-Stirling.com, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.davis-stirling.com/HOME/F/Fiduciary-Duties-of-California-HOA-Directors
3. Insurance Implications of HOAs Using Drones, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.kdisonline.com/the-insurance-implications-of-hoas-using-drones-for-property-management/
4. Essential Guide to Roof Maintenance for Condo Associations – Jobson Roofing, accessed October 27, 2025, https://jobsonroofing.com/roof-maintenance-for-condo-associations/
5. It’s National Ladder Safety Month – CDC Blogs, accessed October 27, 2025, https://blogs.cdc.gov/niosh-science-blog/2017/03/13/ladder-safety-month/
6. Insurance Claims Inspections Reaching New Heights with Drones, accessed October 27, 2025, https://clydepaul.com/insurance-claims-inspections-reaching-new-heights-with-drones/
7. Drone progress tracking software for contractor reporting – Struction Solutions, accessed October 27, 2025, https://structionsolutions.com/blog/drone-progress-tracking-software-for-contractor-reporting/
8. How to Create a Realistic HOA Budget for Roof Maintenance and Replacement, accessed October 27, 2025, https://kamroofingservices.com/realistic-hoa-roof-maintenance-budget/
9. The Cost Savings of Drone Surveys – Balmore Group, accessed October 27, 2025, https://thebalmoregroup.co.uk/the-cost-savings-of-drone-surveys/
10. Budgeting and Cost Estimation for HOA Roofing – VendorSmart, accessed October 27, 2025, https://blog.vendorsmart.com/budgeting-and-cost-estimation-for-hoa-roofing/
11. Classic Template – White – OSHA, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.osha.gov/sites/default/files/workerscomp.ppt
12. Association Usage Of Drones For Code Enforcement & Maintenance – KWPMC, accessed October 27, 2025, https://kwpmc.com/association-usage-of-drones-for-code-enforcement-maintenance/
13. What discounts are available for HOA/Condo Association insurance?, accessed October 27, 2025, https://honeycombinsurance.com/ask-the-expert/hoa-insurance-discounts/
14. Toolkit for Homeowners and HOAs on Insurance – Information and FAQs | DORA, accessed October 27, 2025, https://doi.colorado.gov/homeowners-hoainsurancetoolkit
15. Massachusetts homeowners face insurance cancellations after surprise drone inspections, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/shorts/nrYV2dshXQs
16. Severe Weather Preparation Recovery Toolkit – Ohio Department of Insurance, accessed October 27, 2025, https://insurance.ohio.gov/wps/wcm/connect/gov/97ab907c-d17f-4244-90a5-1c9b4ed8ff6d/SevereWeatherToolkit.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE.Z18_79GCH8013HMOA06A2E16IV2082-97ab907c-d17f-4244-90a5-1c9b4ed8ff6d-oLpEaD8
17. Severe Weather Preparation Recovery Toolkit – Ohio Department of Insurance, accessed October 27, 2025, https://insurance.ohio.gov/wps/wcm/connect/gov/3fb0f9a4-897f-44f7-8fb4-d0d79f69eab8/SevereWeatherToolkit.pdf?MOD=AJPERES&CONVERT_TO=url&CACHEID=ROOTWORKSPACE.Z18_K9I401S01H7F40QBNJU3SO1F56-3fb0f9a4-897f-44f7-8fb4-d0d79f69eab8-nRNlmCa
18. Rules Enforcement – Davis-Stirling.com, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.davis-stirling.com/r/rulesenforcementfines
19. Implementing Drone Policies in HOAs – Kevin Davis Insurance Services, accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.kdisonline.com/implementing-drone-policies-in-hoas-guidance-for-insurance-agents/
20. manage the risks drones create for community associations but don’t ignore their benefits – Marcus Errico Emmer & Brooks, P.C., accessed October 27, 2025, https://www.meeb.com/marcus-errico-emmer-brooks-newsletter/drone-risks-benefits
21. Damaged Property – Summit County Fiscal Office, accessed October 27, 2025, https://fiscaloffice.summitoh.net/index.php/damaged-property
22. Destroyed or Damaged Property – Butler County Auditor, accessed October 27, 2025, https://auditor.bcohio.gov/real_estate/appraisal/damaged_or_destroyed_property/index.php
23. Ohio Property Tax Relief Programs: Are You Eligible? – Sheppard Law Offices, accessed October 27, 2025, https://sheppardlawoffices.com/ohio-property-tax-relief-programs-are-you-eligible/
24. Application for Valuation Deduction for Destroyed or Damaged Real Property, accessed October 27, 2025, https://tax.ohio.gov/static/forms/real_property/dte-dte26-fi.pdf